Why Afraid of Live debate My Dear Indian Democratic leaders?

India is going face or rather fight for democracy in couple of week latter, the all official and unofficial exercises have been started to get maximum out of minimum from already drying pond of Indian democracy.

Open debate is the most powerful and decent tool of any democracy, which I think is missing character from India Demo- crazy (Democracy), where all participants especially political leaders who only try to demonstrate their side only, and not willing to hear from other side.

Live debate on democracy and its all important issues effecting citizens to society and vice versa are not seen any where from day first of Indian democracy, first due to over exposure of charismatic political leadership, where people could not understood the values of their democratic right means vote and use in matter of faith on these leaders like Nehru, Indira Gandhi etc.

After wards came the 1977, when Indian voters tried to change the situation but result again become zero, but after come the times of regional charismatic leaders like Mulayam Singh Yadav, Lalu Yadav, Mayawati, shard pawar etc who not only killed the debate issue at all levels because their charisma are based on but castes, religion and religion not personal thus buried the tradition of open debate in Indian democracy.
BJP Leader L K Advani Challenged Prime Minster Man Mohan Singh for Debate.

I was at pain , when I read the news BJP Leader L K Advani has put Challenged Prime Minster Man Mohan Singh for Live Debate because as Indian researcher on Parliamentary issues, I know the poor records of both Leaders in Indian parliament during debates on national and international in parliament.

As per my political understanding by Challenging Prime Minster Man Mohan Singh or Sonia Gandhi he was eying not on live debate issue but his trail to establish himself as alternate of former.

My humble suggestion to Advani Ji is why live debate with Man Mohan Singh or Sonia Gandhi, Why not with Indian voters???

Redefining Creamy Layer in India

Indian Government is in its process to redefine the definition of Creamy layer in Other Backward Cates (OBC) after Supreme Court of India ordered to keep creamy layer from quota in higher education its recent decision.

On Wednesday National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) has decided to enhance creamy layer income criteria some thing between 4-6 lakh per annum from present Rs/- 2.5 lakh.

My views

On which ground you are asking reservation that is important if you going for it on economical criteria than redefinition should be on the basis of social upliftment not only the basis of economics purely.

On other side if some one asks quota on economical basis that this definition can be ok.

Problem in India is there are no social indicators which can suggest the social development of a citizen’s thus only economical status is applied to gauge the social development not other.

Are Indian government agreed that every OBC earning beyond Six lakh INR per annum is fully socially developed?

I think answer will be??????

So apart from only economical there should be social yard stick while redefining Creamy layers in OBC.