Chandigarh
(I-Haryana News): Haryana Vidhan Sabha on Tuesday passed The Punjab New
Capital (Periphery) Control (Haryana Amendment) Bill, 2012 without any
discussion or debate in one minute time.
The Parliamentary affair Minister, Mr. Randeep Singh Surjewala introduced the bill , The Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control (Haryana Amendment) Bill, 2012 at 12.48pm and requested house to consider this bill for discussion and passage.
No members tried to speak on this all important bill effected development in Panchkula district especially, Village saketri and Panchkula district in general, as this the district which falls
under The Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control act and considered hot
cake for big real estate developers which have direct interests in this
district land.
The
speaker was on seen on hurry to declare bill passed that it took hardly
one minute to house to pass the bill as bill was declared passed by the
Haryana assembly at 12.49pm exactly in duration of one minute.
Intelligent Haryana News Investigation Says;
No
debate or discussion were held in the house on this bill .It is mention
that to pass the bill in ultra speed mode Minister asked the house to
considered and pass the bill in at once, which usually assembly members
allow this because most of MLAs consider their prime work, the
legislative work as burden on them because they do not see their
contributions in law making process.
The
Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control (Haryana Amendment) Bill, 2012
was all important bill as this was related to development In Haryana
area near its capital Chandigarh.
It
is to remember that two MLAs come from this district one from congress
and one from INLD the congress Member did came forwarded to speak,
whereas INLD MLA had already suspended for rest of sessio.
Objective of Bill ( now Act):
In
year 2003, section 22 (aa) of Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled
Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 was inserted
wherein area adjacent to the abadi deh of any village which Government
identifies for village expansion through a notification to such effect
was taken out from purview of the Act ibid.
A
limit of 60 per cent was imposed on such expansion of village abadi.
While implementing the above referred provision, some practical
difficulties came to the notice of the Government such as absence of
rational criteria to fix boundary of extended village abadi (in view of
aforesaid limit of 60 per cent) as most of the villages have expended
beyond 60 per cent of their original abadi deh.
In fact, even unauthorised colonies in the vicinity of Lal Dora of the
village abadi carved out in violation of provisions of Haryana
Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Act, 1975, would also get
de-facto regularised under the disguise of exemption under section 22
(aa) of Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of
Unregulated Development Act, 1963.
In view of above facts and ground realities, purpose for which section
22(aa) was inserted in Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas
Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 is neither being served
nor likely to be served in future. Even Revenue and Disaster Management
Department, Haryana mentioned that the exemption from the Act ibid
could have severe adverse implications resulting in unregulated
structures coming up in the area.
Moreover,
implementation of this provision would create legal complications,
resentment and likely to be misused, hence, this bill to repeal or omit
section 22 (aa) of Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas
Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963
As
far as amendment in Section 25 is concerned, the Department is levying
conversion charges for commercial use for 150 FAR and also for 175 FAR.
The practice in the Department is that notified conversion charges are
taken in case of 150 FAR and for levying of conversion charges for 175
FAR additional 1/6th of notified conversion charges are taken.
The
Amendment in Section 25 (1) of Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled
Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 has been made to
give it a statutory backing. The amendment would authorize Department to
charge differential rates for FAR of 150 and 175 retrospectively.
The
Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Control (Haryana Amendment) Bill, 2012
has been adopted to amend section 15 of the Punjab New Capital
(Periphery) Control Act, 1952.
Source: Intelligent Haryana News
Dinesh Singh Rawat Says:
It will research on the matter before commenting on this money matter issue
No comments:
Post a Comment